top of page

Our Why

Being a school district edtech leader is a constant race against drowning in the urgent. The demands and pressure never stop, and there's not enough time, budget, or expertise to tame the chaos.  Most of us choose to work harder — until we realize that harder isn't sustainable, as we rarely work on the important priorities that deliver consistent and lasting value.

Unfortunately, many of us experience burnout more often, diminishing passion, and an unhealthy work-life balance.  None of that make us better leaders and it undermines our efforts to serve our stakeholders.
 

Arkable Leadership exists to change that difficult reality. It's a place to work smarter, not harder: to shift your time from the urgent to the important, and to lean on the generosity, skills, and hard-won experience of peers who genuinely understand your world.

 

The goal is practical and personal at once — build better systems, lead more effectively, develop your staff's potential, and enhance your career while reducing stress and reclaiming more work-life balance.  Don't go it alone. With support and mentoring from your peers, you can focus on the important instead of continuing to drown in the urgent.

Fighting Against the Status Quo

Through a framework of peer support and mentorship EdTech Leadership Circles fight against the status quo.  Each circle is a small, committed, and proactive group of K-12 edtech professionals who meet regularly to help each become better leaders. A circle is six to ten members — curated so everyone faces similar realities.  Members meet about eight times during the school year about every five to six weeks for roughly two hours, with the same trusted group all year.

Each meeting follows a consistent rhythm.  There's an accountability round where members share the results of a commitment made at the last meeting. The heart of the meeting is "the Ask" — one member presents a real, current challenge, and after group questions and feedback, two or three members work together to generate ideas and concrete recommendations for consideration at the next meeting.

 

Meetings also include a rotating theme — cybersecurity, funding, staffing, vendor decisions — and close with each member setting one commitment for the next accountability cycle. The through-line is your North Star: one or two important goals you're working toward all year, so every commitment moves something that matters.

What's required is meaningful but light. You come prepared (reading a member's written "Ask" ahead of time), participate actively in the room, and follow through between meetings — completing the step you committed to and doing one short, roughly fifteen-minute check-in with your Accountability Partner.  About once a year you'll have the opportunity to present your "Ask" and; a handful of times you'll help someone else with theirs.

 

This is a group for active participants, not spectators - by design.  The effort is concentrated when it's your turn and light when it's not.

Subscribe to our blog

Thanks for signing up!

The Low Trust Tax

Every edtech leader can identify problems that slow or undermine a project: delayed deliveries, poor training, limited experience, miscommunication, no accountability. Harder to see, but often more expensive, is the tax you pay when trust is low. When teachers don't trust a new platform will work because they weren't consulted and don't understand the reason for change. A few may protest silently while others quietly opt out until they're forced to comply, but they're highly

bottom of page